QX50 Sport vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

6.3

8 s

/

189

/

390

/

4810*1925*1742

Engine / Motor

230

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

4693

4810

1903

1925

1679

1742

2800

2800

895

/

/

19

Fuel Economy

11.1

13

60

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

10.25

/

/

10.25"

/

Driver Seat

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

15.6

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

/

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 1997 L

2.0

268 BHP

254

CVT

Automatic

Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

268 BHP

254

380

390

/

Turbocharge

/

2.0T GDI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

19 ADAS Functions

/

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX50 Sport

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Tiggo 9 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose QX50 Sport if you care more about power; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, QX50 Sport has a wheelbase of 2800, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Sport uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.