QX60 Autograph vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5
5033
/
1981
/
1770
/
2900
/
170
/
/
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
✓
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
Sport Seats Plus
Infotainment
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
AT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
3498 L - 3498 L
/
279 - 279
TBD
AT & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 Seater - 7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
279
/
350
/
Technologies
✓
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.