QX60 Autograph vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7
5
5033
4200
1981
1760
1770
1570
2900
2555
170
/
/
Flush Door
/
16
/
5
/
341
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
AT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
3498 L - 3498 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
279 - 279
109 BHP - 113
AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
111 BHP
350
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Autograph
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Autograph if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Autograph has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Autograph has a wheelbase of 2900, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Autograph, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Autograph uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.