QX60 Sensory vs EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5033
4684 mm
1981
2020 mm
1770
1667 mm
2900
2,829 mm
170
/
/
5 Doors
/
495 L
Fuel Economy
8.7
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
265 BHP - 295 BHP
/
AT & Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
6 Seater - 7
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
279
288 BHP
350
520 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about interior space; choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.