QX60 Sensory vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

7

7

5033

5115

1981

1980

1770

1945

2900

/

170

/

/

20

Fuel Economy

8.7

10.1

/

110

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Doors

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Triple

Dual

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

/

Passenger Door

/

Hi Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Front + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

6

Transmission

AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

/

Central And Rear

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

Wheels/brakes

/

265/55 R20

/

265/55 R20

Key Spec

3498 L - 3498 L

3.3 L - 4500 L

279 - 279

235 BHP - 409

AT & Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6 Seater - 7

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

3.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

279

409

350

650

/

V

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX60 Sensory

    • Land Cruiser GXR3

      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree Camera
      • Cool Box
      • Push Button Start
      • Keyless Entry
      • Welcome Light
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Powerful off-road capabilities
    • Exceptional reliability and durability
    • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • High purchase and maintenance costs
    • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickQX60 Sensory

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser GXR3 if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Hyundai | Santa Fe Smartstream G2.5T

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Hyundai | Santa Fe Smartstream G2.5T 2025

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Nissan | PATROL SE T2

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Lexus | NX350h Platinum 2.5L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, Land Cruiser GXR3 is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser GXR3 uses Four-Wheel Drive.