Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L vs F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
6,066
5890 mm
2,012
2463 mm
1,981
1948 mm
3,785
3670 mm
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
7.6 Km/L
9.8 Km/L
/
136 L
/
9.8 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed AISIN Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.7 L
3.3 L - 6.2 L
383 BHP
292 BHP - 720 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT
Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Engine
6.4L
5.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
410
360 BHP
582
515 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L
F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L if you care more about interior space; choose F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a wheelbase of 3,785, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) has a wheelbase of 3670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L uses No data, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) uses All Wheel Drive.