Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L vs T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
6
5
6,066
5365
2,012
1900
1,981
1809
3,785
3155
/
1970
/
16
/
215
Fuel Economy
7.6 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
6-speed AISIN Automatic
6MT
Chassis & Steering
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Double Wishbone
/
Leaf Spring
Wheels/brakes
/
245/70 R16
/
245/70 R16
Engine
6.4L
2.8 L
Gasoline
Diesel
410
147 BHP
582
360
/
Turbocharge
/
110
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.8 L
/
147 BHP - 215 BHP
/
6AT & 6MT
/
Diesel & Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L
T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickT60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L if you care more about interior space; choose T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a wheelbase of 3,785, while T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort has a wheelbase of 3155. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L uses No data, while T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort uses Four-Wheel Drive.