Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Tahoe RST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4371 mm
5181
1996 mm
2053
1649 mm
1925
2681 mm
3071
472 L
3479
/
22
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
9.7
67 L
100
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
/
10.2
/
Jet Black/Victory Red perforated leather seating
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
BOSE
Transmission
Automatic
10AT
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
/
AT
/
10
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Electronic Limited Slip Differential (Active Reponse 4WD)
Engine
2.0 L
6.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
250 BHP
420 BHP
365 Nm
624
Key Spec
/
5.3 L - 5300 L
/
355 BHP - 420 BHP
/
10AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater - 9 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
Tahoe RST
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Tahoe RST if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Tahoe RST has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Tahoe RST has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe RST, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Tahoe RST uses Four-Wheel Drive.