Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) vs L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
169 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
3 Seater
5080 mm
5300 mm
1720 mm
1815 mm
1680 mm
1780 mm
3050 mm
3000 mm
830 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
60 L
75 L
12.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.4 L - 2.5 L
217 BHP
128 BHP - 148 BHP
Manual
Manual
Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
217 BHP
128 BHP
136 Nm
202 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy; choose L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while L200 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.