Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
5370 mm
1720 mm
1918 mm
1680 mm
1884 mm
3050 mm
3270 mm
830 L
1200 L
/
4 Doors
/
230 m
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
8 Km/L
60 L
80 L
12.7 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
217 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
217 BHP
168 BHP
136 Nm
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRanger XL 2.0T (LOW)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.