RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs GV70 2.5T Prestige Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4507 mm
4715 mm
1851 mm
1910 mm
1557 mm
1630 mm
2681 mm
2875 mm
530 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
10.8 Km/L
64 L
66 L
14.9 Km/L
10.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
400 BHP
304 BHP - 380 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
304 BHP
480 Nm
422 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GV70 2.5T Prestige
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGV70 2.5T Prestige
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about fuel economy; choose GV70 2.5T Prestige if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while GV70 2.5T Prestige has a fuel consumption of 9.26. Therefore, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while GV70 2.5T Prestige has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GV70 2.5T Prestige, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while GV70 2.5T Prestige uses Rear Wheel Drive.