RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs NX350h Premier 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4507 mm
4660 mm
1851 mm
1865 mm
1557 mm
1670 mm
2681 mm
2690 mm
530 L
320 L
/
5 Doors
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
15 Km/L
64 L
55 L
14.9 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.4 L - 2.5 L
400 BHP
240 BHP - 275
TBD
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & CVT Transmission
Gasoline
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
400 BHP
240 BHP
480 Nm
370 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
NX350h Premier 2.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNX350h Premier 2.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about power; choose NX350h Premier 2.5L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while NX350h Premier 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, NX350h Premier 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while NX350h Premier 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2690 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, NX350h Premier 2.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while NX350h Premier 2.5L uses All Wheel Drive.