RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4507 mm
4890 mm
1851 mm
1920 mm
1557 mm
1695 mm
2681 mm
2850 mm
530 L
350 L
/
5 Doors
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
15 Km/L
64 L
65 L
14.9 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
21
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
3.5 L - 3.5 L
400 BHP
246 BHP - 366 BHP
TBD
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
400 BHP
246 BHP
480 Nm
315 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
RX 350h Platinum 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about price; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.