RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L vs Q6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

/

4

/

2480 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4485 mm

/

1856 mm

/

1585 mm

/

2680 mm

/

530 L

/

170 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

65 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.5 L

/

400 BHP

279 BHP

TBD

DHT

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

400 BHP

279 BHP

480 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Q6 e-tron

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickRS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L if you care more about price; choose Q6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

    Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

    Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    VS

    Ford | Ford Bronco 2021 2.7T Big Lands

    Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2024 2.7T V6 Reserve LUX PKG

    Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Macan 2020 S

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 10, while Q6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Q6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while Q6 e-tron uses No data.