RX5 1.5T STD vs Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
190
/
3
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
4.191
1855 mm
1.794
1719 mm
1.508
2708 mm
2.601
430 L
405
145
/
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
22.7
55 L
50
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.0 L - 1395 L
169 BHP - 171 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
171 BHP
116 BHP
275 Nm
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAudi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about interior space; choose Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a wheelbase of 2.601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX5 1.5T STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.