RX5 1.5T STD vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
Dimensions
5
5
18
/
4571 mm
/
1855 mm
/
1719 mm
/
2708 mm
/
430 L
514
145
/
/
64
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
/
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14.1
14.5
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
7DCT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
/
169 BHP - 220 BHP
TBD
7DCT & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
171 BHP
/
275 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.