S 580 4MATIC vs Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5,283
4572 mm
2,109
1825 mm
1,503
1482 mm
3,216
2670 mm
/
430 L
Fuel Economy
10
14.3 Km/L
76
48 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
1.5
TBD
116
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
TBD
5
Engine
4.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo (≈ 3,982-4,000 cc)
/
503 hp
114 BHP
700
141 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 580 4MATIC
Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickArrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3,216, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 580 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) uses Front Wheel Drive.