Seal 6 Design vs Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
240 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1630
/
4
/
4830
4830 mm
1875
1870 mm
1495
1400 mm
2790
2905 mm
491
406 L
Fuel Economy
16.95
12.7 Km/L
/
60 L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Dual
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Battery/Charging
3.3
/
Transmission
eCVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
174
251 BHP
/
353 Nm
Motor
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.3 L
/
251 BHP - 365 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about fuel economy; choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.