Seal Performance vs 3.5 Gasoline Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Chinese
/
/
3,470
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
2185
/
4 Doors
/
4800 mm
5050
1875 mm
1880
1460 mm
1480
2920 mm
2895
400 L
/
145 mm
/
/
1624
/
1631
Fuel Economy
/
13.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Double wishbone suspension
MacPherson Strut
Multi- link（5 links）
MacPherson Strut
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
/
204 BHP - 523 BHP
177 - 300 BHP
AT
8 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
520 km - 570 km
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
523 BHP
296
390
6,400
670 Nm
36.6
/
3.5
/
5,000
Motor
9
/
Blade Battery (LFP)
/
150 kW
/
Technologies
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal Performance
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Seat belt reminder
3.5 Gasoline
- Power Tailgate
- Welcome Light
- Number of Airbags
- Driving Recorder
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal Performance if you care more about price; choose 3.5 Gasoline if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal Performance has a fuel consumption of No data, while 3.5 Gasoline has a fuel consumption of 7.58. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal Performance has a wheelbase of 2920 mm, while 3.5 Gasoline has a wheelbase of 2895. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal Performance, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal Performance uses All Wheel Drive, while 3.5 Gasoline uses No data.