Sequoia Limited vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
5285 mm
4810
2021 mm
1925
1892 mm
1742
3100 mm
2800
2460 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
13
85 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.7 L
-
381 BHP - 437 BHP
254 - 254
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 8 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0L
Hybrid
Gasoline
437 BHP
254
790 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sequoia Limited
- Rear Camera
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Powerful engine performance
- High level of reliability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technical options
- Relatively high price
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sequoia Limited if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sequoia Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sequoia Limited has a wheelbase of 3100 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sequoia Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sequoia Limited uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.