Shark 6 Premium vs Amarok Comfortline 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1500 cc
1998 cc
GCC
European
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5457 mm
5350 mm
1971 mm
1910 mm
1925 mm
1886 mm
3260 mm
3268 mm
1200 L
/
230 mm
217 m
Fuel Economy
12.8
10.2 Km/L
59 L
80 L
10 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Bucket
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.0 L - 3.0 L
430 BHP
168 BHP - 247 BHP
AT
10 Speed Automatic & Automatic
Hybrid
Diesel
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED with Halogen
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Diesel
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
430 BHP
168 BHP
650 Nm
405 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Amarok Comfortline 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about power; choose Amarok Comfortline 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8, while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Amarok Comfortline 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm , while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3268 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Amarok Comfortline 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive , while Amarok Comfortline 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.