Shine E1 vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190
4
4
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5
16
19
4 Doors
/
4670 mm
4650
1812 mm
1905
1490 mm
1630
2680 mm
2775
454 L
/
150 mm
/
/
1480
Fuel Economy
14
15.8
50 L
51
14 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
10.25
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
205/55 R16
235/55 R19
205/55 R16
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.5
1.5
123 BHP - 195 BHP
202 BHP
AT
AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
123 BHP
202 BHP
158 Nm
305
Technologies
✓
✓
ECO/ SPORT
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Shine E1
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Child Lock
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickShine E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Shine E1 if you care more about price; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Shine E1 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Shine E1 has a wheelbase of 2680 mm , while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Shine E1 uses Front Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.