Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
161 km/h
4
/
1497 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4825 mm
4341 mm
1870 mm
1804 mm
1691 mm
1693 mm
2800 mm
2676 mm
up to 1800 L
414 L
200 mm
/
Fuel Economy
55 L
50 L
14 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
TCS
/
ESP/ ARP
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
Transmission
6AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Multi-Link Lateral Strut
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6 L
Petrol
Gasoline
1.5T
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
154 BHP
115 BHP
115/5600
/
215 Nm
156 Nm
215/2000-4000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury has a wheelbase of 2800 mm , while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sinotruk U70 Pro Luxury uses Front Wheel Drive , while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.