SLE 2.7L vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18" or 20"
/
5,890
5370 mm
2,062
1918 mm
1,917
1884 mm
/
4 Doors
/
3270 mm
/
1200 L
/
230 m
Fuel Economy
9
8 Km/L
91
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.4"
10
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L
2.0 L - 3198 L
401 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Turbocharge
/
/
/
310 HP
168 BHP
583 Nm
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SLE 2.7L
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SLE 2.7L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SLE 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, SLE 2.7L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SLE 2.7L has a wheelbase of No data, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE 2.7L uses No data, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.