Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186 km/h
230 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4397 mm
4680 mm
1735 mm
2160 mm
1516 mm
1670 mm
2525 mm
2818 mm
396 L
525 L
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
11.2 Km/L
46 L
64 L
15.4 Km/L
11.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
280 BHP
155 Nm
400 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.9 L
/
280 BHP - 510 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Stelvio Veloce
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStelvio Veloce
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan if you care more about fuel economy; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan has a wheelbase of 2525 mm, while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stelvio Veloce, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sonic 1.6 LS Sedan uses Front Wheel Drive, while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.