SQ6 e-tron vs 500 Signature 3.0T Comparison

Car Information

598 km

/

800V

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

6

/

2899 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

514

545 L

64

/

/

5 Doors

/

4886 mm

/

1934 mm

/

1905 mm

/

2850 mm

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

/

8 Km/L

/

80 L

/

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

Leather

/

Sport Seats Plus

Standard

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.5

14.6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

/

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

342 BHP - 348 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

/

5

7 Seater

/

2.0 L - 3.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

348 BHP

/

500 Nm

Motor

Lithium-ion

/

489

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • 500 Signature 3.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick500 Signature 3.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose 500 Signature 3.0T if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while 500 Signature 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while 500 Signature 3.0T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 500 Signature 3.0T uses All Wheel Drive.