SQ6 e-tron vs All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT Comparison

Car Information

598 km

/

800V

/

Engine / Motor

/

4

Dimensions

5

5

514

478

64

/

/

1235

/

4341

/

2052

/

1693

/

1785

/

5.07

/

491

Fuel Economy

/

50

Comfort

/

Interior

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear

/

Safety

/

Front Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front

Infotainment

14.5

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

/

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

CVT

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

215/65 R16

/

215/65 R16

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

105 BHP - 135 BHP

DHT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

5 - 5

/

1.6 L - 2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

1.6

Electric

Gasoline

/

115

Motor

Lithium-ion

/

489

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAll-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Jeep | Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 6.4L V8

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2021 Long Range (AWD)

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Toyota | Sequoia TRD Pro

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Audi | Q8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT uses No data.