SQ6 e-tron vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185
/
3
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
514
448
64
/
/
4.314
/
1.809
/
1.624
/
2.585
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.5
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
270
/
11
/
10 min
/
Transmission
DHT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
对
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
112 BHP - 168
DHT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
1.3 L - 1.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.3 L
Electric
Petrol
/
160 BHP
/
230
Motor
Lithium-ion
/
489
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.