SQ6 e-tron vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
514
645 L
64
/
/
4922 mm
/
2004 mm
/
1745 mm
/
2975 mm
Fuel Economy
/
9.5 Km/L
/
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
14.5
/
Battery/Charging
270
/
11
/
10 min
/
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
对
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
235 BHP - 530 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
3.0 L - 4800 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
4.4 L
Electric
Gasoline
/
530 BHP
/
750 Nm
Motor
Lithium-ion
/
489
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
X5 M50i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price; choose X5 M50i xDrive if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while X5 M50i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while X5 M50i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while X5 M50i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.