SU7 Ultra vs Charger 3.6L GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
350 km/h
210 km/h
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4997 mm
5040 mm
1963 mm
1905 mm
1455 mm
1479 mm
3000 mm
3052 mm
517 L
455 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.3 Km/L
/
70 L
/
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
16.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
1548 BHP
292 BHP - 707 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
800 km
/
5
5 Seater
/
3.6 L - 6.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
1548 BHP
300 BHP
1770 Nm
358 Nm
/
3.6 L
Motor
3
/
options.Lithium
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
SU7 Ultra
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Charger 3.6L GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCharger 3.6L GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SU7 Ultra if you care more about power; choose Charger 3.6L GT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SU7 Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while Charger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SU7 Ultra has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while Charger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 3052 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Charger 3.6L GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SU7 Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while Charger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.