SU7 Ultra vs XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
350 km/h
250 km/h
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4997 mm
4954 mm
1963 mm
2091 mm
1455 mm
1457 mm
3000 mm
2960 mm
517 L
540 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
74 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
16.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
1548 BHP
235 BHP - 550 BHP
DHT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
800 km
/
5
5 - 5
/
2.0 L - 5.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
1548 BHP
300 BHP
1770 Nm
400 Nm
/
2.0 L
Motor
3
/
options.Lithium
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
SU7 Ultra
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SU7 Ultra if you care more about interior space; choose XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SU7 Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SU7 Ultra has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2960 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, SU7 Ultra, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SU7 Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while XF 2.0T R-Dynamic SE (300 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive.