Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs 208 1.2T Active Plus Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
155
208 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
4055 mm
1600
1960 mm
1540
1430 mm
2425
2540 mm
254
311 L
Fuel Economy
23.3
17.2 Km/L
35
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.1 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
67 BHP
115 BHP - 136 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Single Speed Transmission
Gasoline
Electric & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.0 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
130 BHP
90
230 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
208 1.2T Active Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick208 1.2T Active Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about fuel economy; choose 208 1.2T Active Plus if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while 208 1.2T Active Plus has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while 208 1.2T Active Plus has a wheelbase of 2540 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 208 1.2T Active Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while 208 1.2T Active Plus uses Front Wheel Drive.