Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4150
/
1755
/
1605
/
2500
/
253
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
42
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
150 BHP
TBD
CVT
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
150 BHP
/
190
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2017 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.