Tank 700 Limited vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
3180
/
22"
/
5110
4760 mm
2122
1930 mm
1986
1927 mm
3000
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
85
75 L
/
15 Km/L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
9 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Front four-wheel drive
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Ventilated Disc
/
275/50 R22
/
275/50 R22
/
Engine
3.0T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
360
342 BHP
800
648 Nm
95
/
aluminum alloy
/
aluminum alloy
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.0 L
/
217 BHP - 342 BHP
/
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Hybrid
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 700 Limited
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 700 Limited if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 700 Limited has a fuel consumption of 10.9, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 700 Limited has a wheelbase of 3000, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 700 Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 700 Limited uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.