Tank 700 Ultimate vs EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
3110
/
20"
/
5090
4684 mm
2061
2020 mm
1952
1667 mm
3000
2,829 mm
/
5 Doors
/
495 L
Fuel Economy
85
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Front four-wheel drive
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Ventilated Disc
/
275/60 R20
/
275/60 R20
/
Engine
3.0T
/
Hybrid
Electric
Turbocharge
/
360
288 BHP
800
520 Nm
95
/
aluminum alloy
/
aluminum alloy
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 700 Ultimate
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 700 Ultimate if you care more about interior space; choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 700 Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 10.9, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 700 Ultimate has a wheelbase of 3000, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 700 Ultimate, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 700 Ultimate uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.