Tasman vs Shark 6 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
/
4
/
1500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
5457 mm
/
1971 mm
/
1925 mm
/
3260 mm
/
1200 L
/
230 mm
Fuel Economy
/
12.8
/
59 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Engine
Gasoline
Hybrid
/
In-Line
/
1.5T
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
430 BHP
/
650 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.5T
/
430 BHP
/
AT
/
Hybrid
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tasman
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickShark 6 Premium
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tasman if you care more about overall equipment; choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tasman has a fuel consumption of No data, while Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tasman has a wheelbase of No data, while Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tasman uses No data, while Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive .