Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
5
5000
/
1990
/
1750
/
2900
/
/
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
/
/
71
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
/
对
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.8 L - 3.8 L
/
291 - 291
TBD
8 Speed AT & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 8
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8
/
Gasoline
Electric
291
/
217
/
6100
/
355
/
5200
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI has a wheelbase of 2900, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Telluride 3.8 V6 GDI uses No data, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.