Teramont Comfortline vs Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
6
1998 cc
/
European
/
Dimensions
7
8
20
/
5 Doors
/
5103
5046
1990
1975
1787
1795
2980
2900
583
470
180
/
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
9.4
70 L
74
9.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
2nd Seat Row
/
Front And Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For All 3 rows, Side Airbags In Front.
/
Front Assist
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Mounting 3 Child Seats On The 2nd Row
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3597 L
3.5 L - 3498 L
235 BHP - 276 BHP
254 BHP - 271 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
9AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7 - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
270 BHP
271 BHP
370 Nm
340
/
V6 9AT
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340 @ 4,800
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Teramont Comfortline
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Keeping Assist
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Teramont Comfortline if you care more about fuel economy; choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Teramont Comfortline has a fuel consumption of 10.31, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Teramont Comfortline is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Teramont Comfortline has a wheelbase of 2980, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Teramont Comfortline, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Teramont Comfortline uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.