Ti 3 RWD Pro vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison

Car Information

7.9

/

501

/

65.28

/

Engine / Motor

/

170 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4605

4335 mm

1900

1814 mm

1720

1695 mm

/

2560 mm

/

500 L

Fuel Economy

/

12.2 Km/L

/

55 L

/

12.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Safety

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

218 BHP - 422 BHP

148 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

1.5 L

/

TBD

Engine

/

1.5 L

Electric

Gasoline

218 BHP

148 BHP

/

210 Nm

Exterior

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ti 3 RWD Pro

    • H2 1.5T Intelligent

      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • ABS

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about power; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    SERES | 5 2WD Standard

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    SERES | 5 4WD Premium

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.