Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
16
/
5
/
4200
4341 mm
1760
1804 mm
1570
1693 mm
2555
2676 mm
341
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 1998 L
109 BHP - 113
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5L
/
111 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.