Tiggo 4 Pro vs Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
6
18 inch
235/55/R20
4820
4995
1930
1960
1699
1760
2630
2920
/
1985
Fuel Economy
/
14.9
51
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
●
/
●
/
Front door keyless entry
/
Manual
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather+Imitation leather
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Forward collision warning system（FCW）
✓
Blind spot monitoring system（BSD）
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
●
✓
●
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.6
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
10
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson independent suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
/
Electrical park brake (EPB)
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
113 BHP - 156
252 - 337 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
156
252
115
/
230
380
/
TGDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco, Comfort, Sport
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats
- 360 Degree Camera
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro has a wheelbase of 2630, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro uses Front Drive, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats uses Front Drive.