Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 vs Forthing Friday REEV Comparison
Car Information
/
SUV/
1,100
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
17
/
5
/
4318
4,600
1831
1,860
1662
1,680
2610
2,715
Fuel Economy
/
18.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic (single-speed)
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
113 BHP - 156
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
1.5L
/
111 BHP
204
/
340
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Forthing Friday REEV
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickForthing Friday REEV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Forthing Friday REEV if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Forthing Friday REEV has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Forthing Friday REEV has a wheelbase of 2,715. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Forthing Friday REEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro COM 2025 uses Front Drive, while Forthing Friday REEV uses No data.