Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

7 Seater

18

/

5

5 Doors

4318

4950 mm

1831

1930 mm

1662

1730 mm

2610

2850 mm

Fuel Economy

/

20 Km/L

/

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

7

/

/

TFT

/

Cloth, PVC

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Dual Front Airbags, Front Side Airbags, Side Curtain Airbags

/

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/55 R18

/

215/55 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

113 BHP - 156

240 - 240

Automatic & CVT

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 - 7

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

1.5TCI

/

145 BHP

240 BHP

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

/

237 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2610, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.