Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs 408 GT Comparison

Car Information

187

158

390

300

4720×1860×1705

/

2.0

/

/

8.2

Dimensions

7

5

19 inch

/

4720

4687

1860

1848

1705

1486

2710

2787

/

536

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

245/50 R20

/

245/50 R20

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2000 L

1.6 L - 1.6 L

254 - 310 BHP

215 - 215

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.6

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

254

215

187

158

390

300

/

5500

/

2000

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 8 Pro Max

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick408 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 8 Pro Max if you care more about power; choose 408 GT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Peugeot | ALLURE

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Peugeot | 408 GT

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Peugeot | ALL-NEW 5008 GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a fuel consumption of No data, while 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a wheelbase of 2710, while 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 408 GT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 408 GT uses No data.