Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,605
4341 mm
1,900
1804 mm
1,720
1693 mm
2,745
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
422
115 BHP
510
156 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 153 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra)
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra) if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra) has a wheelbase of 2,745, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Titanium 3 AWD (Ultra) uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.