Touareg Trend 2.0 vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
190 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
European
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
/
4889
4275 mm
1984
1765 mm
1713
1535 mm
2894
2570 mm
810
240 L
213
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
75 L
48 L
12 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation Side Airbag And Curtain Airbag In Front (Driver And Passenger Seat)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 4.2 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
250 BHP - 360 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
8 Speed Automatic & Automatic
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
250 BHP
148 BHP
370 Nm
192 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Touareg Trend 2.0
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Touareg Trend 2.0 if you care more about interior space; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Touareg Trend 2.0 has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Touareg Trend 2.0 has a wheelbase of 2894, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Touareg Trend 2.0, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Touareg Trend 2.0 uses All Wheel Drive, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.