GR86 A/T 2.4L vs Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback Comparison
Car Information
/
5.5
Engine / Motor
4
6
/
181
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
18
✓
4265 mm
4.783
1775 mm
2.080
1310 mm
1.382
/
2.720
/
382
Fuel Economy
13.4
8.8
50 L
60
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.4 L
5.2 L - 5000 L
228 BHP - 228 BHP
310 BHP - 760 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
4 - 4
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.7 L
Petrol
Petrol
228 BHP
300 BHP
250 Nm
379
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback has a fuel consumption of 11.36. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback has a wheelbase of 2.720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Ford Mustang 2019 3.7L Fastback uses Rear Wheel Drive.