GR86 A/T 2.4L vs GR86 MT 2.4L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
4 Seater
4
18
18
4265 mm
4265
1775 mm
1775
1310 mm
1310
Fuel Economy
13.4
12.2
50 L
50
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
Dual
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
/
8
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
6-speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
215/40 R18
Key Spec
2.4 L - 228.0 L
2.4 L - 228.0 L
228 BHP - 233 BHP
228 BHP - 233 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
4 Seater - 4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.4L
Petrol
Gasoline
228 BHP
228
250 Nm
250
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
GR86 MT 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data.