Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4390
4545 mm
1795
1856 mm
1565
1668 mm
2640
2680 mm
377
470 L
Fuel Economy
25.6
14.7 Km/L
43
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L - 1197 L
1.5 L
113 BHP - 121 BHP
165 BHP
CVT
TBD
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
121 BHP
165 BHP
304
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 3.91, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2640, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota C HR 2024 1.8L Dynamic Hybrid uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.