Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD) vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4670
/
1905
/
1830
/
2690
/
790
514
/
64
Fuel Economy
7.9
/
159 (Dual Tank - 72L + 87L)
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
270 BHP - 275 BHP
TBD
Automatic & Manual
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
270 BHP
/
380
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD)
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 12.66, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2690, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota FJ Cruiser 2024 4.0L STD (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.